iCufflinks improved battery life code hacking…

Scott writes -

Testing is done for now. Quick synopsis (TL;DR), don’t get rid of the resistor if you want batteries to last. I tested with the full PWM values from 1-255 and then halved them to range from 1-128 (see chart 1). I quartered them as well but ended up not using it because the half ended up disappointing.

6012048606 29B575Eb88

Chart 2 shows the average current versus the resistor value for the different PWM values.

6011680363 1C71E2599C

Lastly in Chart 3, I measured the light output of the LED. If anyone cares, using a Sekonic L-508 spot meter.

6011680541 6946D32129

What this is showing is that no matter which resistor value (or no resistor) you pick when using a lower output PWM, it will never match the light output of the full range PWM values with the existing 220 ohm resistor.

Bottom line, if you want to keep the same quality of light output, you can’t change the PWM to a lower duty cycle.

Oh man this is the best post ever. LOOK AT THOSE GRAPHS! CHECK OUT THAT DATA!

Filed under: wearables — by adafruit, posted August 5, 2011 at 1:29 pm


Try Adafruit's new iPhone & iPad app for makers! Circuit Playground! "Incredibly handy for anyone working in electronics. Perfect for engineers and non-engineers alike."
Looking for engineers, makers and the builders of dreams? Try our Adafruit job boards.
Join our weekly Adafruit SHOW-AND-TELL at 9:30pm ET every Saturday night! Then at 10pm, ASK-AN-ENGINEER with Ladyada and the Adafruit team!

1 Comment

  1. Fun investigation, cool. :)

    Comment by Zak — August 6, 2011 @ 2:06 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

www.flickr.com
adafruit's items Go to adafruit's photostream
www.flickr.com
items in Adafruits More in Adafruits pool